The beauty of being a GTO User... is that you don't feel guilty about the catastrophes happening all around the world. You can only feel sad about it and how helpless people are in the face of these super storms. Let's face it, we have not been experiencing these in the past. We are only becoming more resilient and adjust to the new norms. 
Reacting or Adoptive Action (RAA) to an event is a lowly evolved move nothing short of stupidity. Pre-emptive Preventive Action (PPA) is what I would call a highly evolved activity... nothing short of genius. 

RAA vs. PPA which one is better?

Here are some solutions under the RAA category:
1. Insurance
2. Carbon Cap and Credit
3. Building Disaster Proof Infrastructures and Mass Transport Systems

Examples of PPA:
1. Tree Planting and Environmentally Centered City Planning
2. Green Energy Utilization
3. Complete Abandonment of Coal Fire Power and lastly;
4. Using Green Technology on all existing internal combustion engines. (Ultra Low Emissions Solutions)

RAA tells us to accept and embrace the upcoming disasters as a force of nature, we can not do anything about it, we just have to deal with it. Hopefully, we would all survive and benefit from the RAA solutions after the storm has passed and completely surrender to the circumstances. Who benefits? - the Elites/ Oligarchs/ Big Corp. at the expense of the masses.

PPA tells us that we actually have the power in our hands to somehow prevent the storm to brew in the very first place. We are actually empowering all of humanity to stand true to the fact that they are the stewards of this earth. Who benefits? - Humanity, at the expense of Big Corp.

GTO - the green technology oil is a perfect example of a PPA solution. It empowers the people by liberating them from the Big Oil Change deception. It cuts at least 5 to 15 metric tonnes of Carbon Footprint per vehicle yearly. Potentially, it can cut Global Carbon Footprint by as much as 70%!

We need to be part of the solution. Not part of the problem.

The real picture is... for as long as your vehicle runs without GTO in it... then you are also part of the problem. 

No comments:

Carbon Footprint Calculator

Notes to ponder

NASA claims that the government could slow down worldwide global warming by cutting down on soot emissions. Studies by NASA show that cutting down on soot would not only have an immediate cooling effect, but would also put a stop to many of the deaths caused by air pollution. When soot is formed, it typically travels through the air absorbing and releasing solar radiation which in turn begins to warm the atmosphere. Cutting soot emissions would be an immediate help against global warming, as the soot would quickly fall out of the atmosphere and begin to cool it down.

Cutting back on soot emissions would buy us time in our fight against global warming. Soot is caused by the partial burning of fossil fuels, wood and vegetation. Soot is known to contain over forty different cancer causing chemicals, and a complete cut would offer untold health benefits worldwide.

Environmental conservation has always been a topic for lengthy discussions, but up until recent times, global warming and climate changes were vague subjects, with no hard proof. Not surprisingly, the previous lack of attention to these issues have created a very gloomy outlook on our future. So, considering all this, what could be the biggest contributor to climate changes through global warming? Transportation - the man-made iron horses, flying machines and sea monsters, so to speak.

The question we have now is how green is our transportation? The majority of the worlds' vehicles are fueled by oil (petrol, diesel and kerosene). Even if they rely on electricity, the stations used to generate this electricity use fossil fuels for power! Excluding vehicle manufacture, transportation is responsible for 14% of the artificially created greenhouse emissions, mostly carbondioxide.

Automobiles, trains and planes are all responsible for this problem, but cars are the highest impact-makers. They release approximately six times more carbondioxide than a plane and seven times more than sea vessels.

What is Air Pollution?

Air pollution is somewhat difficult to define because many air pollutants, at low concentrations, are essential nutrients for the sustainable development of ecosystems. So, air pollution could be defined as:A state of the atmosphere, which leads to the exposure of human beings and/or ecosystems to such high levels or loads of specific compounds or mixtures thereof, that damage is caused. With very few exceptions, all compounds that are considered air pollutants have both natural as well as human-made origins.

Air pollution is not a new phenomenon; in Medieval times, the burning of coal was forbidden in London while Parliament was in session. Air pollution problems have dramatically increased in intensity as well as scale due to the increase in emissions since the Industrial Revolution.